After the Ghosh Babu comparison test, I decided to try Goswami Dada. Again, the same environment, the same offers and the same “years of trust” label that is used on dozens of pages. So let’s go then – one month of Goswami Dada predictions through four popular channels. Of course, as always, there will be no subjective opinions, just figures and statistics collected in boring Excel table. Please see below how my one month went.
Logging Process
For 30 days I was logging all eight Baji predictions from four “verified” Goswami Dada channels before the result announcement. Then, after each Baji, I was checking if the actual patti and single digit match with the offered tips. Since both types of predictions have different rates of success, the both types of tips were logged separately. Generally, all the data was gathered in simple sheet without any deletions or data selections in case of bad days.
Statistics After 30 Days
Generally, during 30 days there were around 960 patti predictions and 960 single-digit predictions offered via four Goswami Dada channels. Here are the numbers distribution:
- Hits among all full patti predictions: 11 out of 960 predictions (approx 1.14 percent accuracy)
- Hits among all single-digit tips: 87 out of 960 predictions (approx 9.06 percent accuracy)
- There were 6 cases of failing for 20 or more times in a row.
- There were 9 days when all 8 Bajis were failing.
The Truth About Single Digit Tips
And here comes the crucial part of the statistics that most people tend to ignore. The single digit prediction has 10 possible results – from 0 to 9, which means that guessing randomly gives you 10 percent chances of hitting. Goswami Dada channels were able to make 9.06 percent hits, which is a bit less than random guessing. Try to think about it for a second. The tipster, presenting himself as the insider, fails to make his predictions more accurate than guessing ten times and choosing one of those guesses.
The Reality of Patti Prediction
- Full patti prediction has 1000 possible outcomes from 000 to 999.
- Purely random guessing gives you 0.1 percent accuracy.
- Goswami Dada channels manage to hit 1.14 percent, which is slightly better than random.
- The hits are purely random and there is no pattern in them.
- Not a single channel manages to give two correct Bajis in a row.
Why The Hype Continues Working
Despite the poor level of the actual accuracy, Goswami Dada branding continues growing every month. And here is the explanation – the human brain is selective. People remember the two-three successful predictions and forget 20 unsuccessful ones. Additionally, Goswami Dada channels hide all the unsuccessful predictions in their archives and keep only the successful tips there. That means that when a new person checks the “track record” of the channel, he sees the legendary accuracy percentage, but not a selected highlights page.
The Proof from My Month of Logging
- Goswami Dada’s predictions are unable to beat the random probability at all.
- The tipster’s identity is a brand, not an analytical system.
- The free tips are a bait to get VIP subscription later.
- The screenshots on social media do not prove anything about accuracy.
- Long-term logging will show everything in the end.
Conclusion
The one-month long logging of Goswami Dada predictions showed me one thing for sure. No tipster brand in Kolkata Fatafat is able to beat the luck. The name may look good, the branding may look authentic, but the numbers will speak about everything in the end. Treat any Fatafat game as the entertainment, keep your budget low and never believe in any tipster’s predictions.
